|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jada Maroo
   |
Posted - 2011.05.02 21:10:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Jada Maroo on 02/05/2011 21:17:00
 Originally by: Zhul Guixgrixks
Fox-News saves the day :
Obama Bin Laden Dead
Local Fox affiliate, not Fox News. But that's hardly the first time people stumble over the similarities between Obama and Osama. One need only look at a speech by perpetual drunkard, lifelong Democrat, liberal activist, and killer Democrat Senator Teddy Kennedy for the funniest example:
*Hiccup*
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.02 21:22:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Kale Anderson
it's still weird that the mission was a "kill only". youd've thought they would want him alive.
If he were captured alive, where ever he was being kept would become the world's biggest target.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.02 21:59:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Bane Necran
Really? Even with the FBI and George Bush himself saying they don't care about him, you still believe that?
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
How was that relevant to what I said? It wasn't.
Bin Laden likely didn't have a direct hand in terror plots anymore and his death probably won't mean much for national security. Since 9/11 he was mostly a figurehead. So, Bush's statement was in fact correct. But that doesn't mean you don't dance on his grave when he's killed, or that his followers wouldn't have bombed whatever prison housed him had he been captured alive.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.02 22:03:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Kale Anderson
nobodies seemed to care that we've had his buddies locked up here for ages, same with ******* though he is a different story.
Not true! Plenty of people complained about Osama's buddies being detained. Candidate Obama, the ACLU, Amnesty International, Code Pink, Michael Moore, leftist activists, anti war protestors, European politicians, Hollywood-types... I could go on, but I'd hit the character limit eventually.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.03 00:46:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Apex Bex
My only hope is that the U.S. Government can find someone else for us to hate and fear pretty soon. I'd hate to see the U.S. war machine stalled and their governemnt's domination of crude oil deposits come into dispute all because there was no one left to hate/kill/oppress.
With any luck the Koreans will find some oil soon so we can all hate them too and more soldiers can go die for their country; but at least the U.S.'s oil interests will be secure.
YAY!
Wow, you better hope the United States always exists else you might have to find someone else to blame for all the world's problems. Oh, wait, you can always blame Israel!
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.03 00:49:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Hugo Smith
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/7891544/Osama-bin-Ladens-son-says-his-father-is-still-alive.html
^ Ill just leave this here
To be honest id believe this guy over anyone who could be classed as a politician. Let alone an American one.
I'm not sure why you believe him when, literally, his only 'evidence' is a feeling that the "world would change" if his father died and he freely admits he has no actual facts supporting it.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.03 01:26:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Apex Bex
The fact that 85% of your population believe in God (in this day and age, seriously?) tells me all I need to know about the Amercian psyche.
Clearly you are the elite minority with all the answers! 
We should all strive to know the unknowable as much as you. 
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.03 01:41:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Apex Bex
The unknowable shall remain unknown. 85% of you believe the unbelievable.
You assume you know what I believe. That is sneaky!
But I don't have to believe anything at all. I just have to know that dismissing other peoples' ability to have faith isn't necessary for me to feel better about the state of my existence. 
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.03 17:53:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Jada Maroo on 03/05/2011 17:55:46
Much to the media's dismay, it seems that a poll bounce for Obama isn't materializing. Can't say that I'm surprised. I was watching the president's speech with some people who aren't political, and as soon as he started with all the "I did this, I directed that" they laughed at him trying to take credit.
That said, I thought he'd at least get a bigger poll bump than he has. I knew it would quickly go away -- they always do.
As I heard someone say earlier: "You can't put Osama's blood in your gas tank."
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.03 23:24:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Blacksquirrel
Think glenn beck is bad... Pakistan is rife with Becks.
Glenn Beck is great. He's single handedly forced more Marxists and radicals out of the Obama administration than all of the elected Republicans combined. As an added benefit, the left hates him!
That said, he can't compare to Mark Levin. No one can. 
|
|
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 00:27:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Jada Maroo on 04/05/2011 00:28:35
Originally by: Astenion
He's also so out of his mind and delusional that Fox fired him. Let me repeat that so it sinks in:
FOX FIRED GLENN BECK BECAUSE HE'S COMPLETELY DELUSIONAL AND INSANE.
Except they didn't fire him. He's going to continue to produce content for them, and is likely to start his own network. Beck has been heading in that direction for a while, with his own news site and internet content network recently hired S.E. Cupp).
And what precisely has he been wrong about? There are two things that leftists point to most when criticizing Beck.
The first is when he implied President Obama was racist against white people. This is something Beck himself has long since said didn't actually mean. At the time he wasn't familiar with the concept he was trying to establish and lacked the proper word.
The idea was much better expressed in a book from Dinesh D'Souza (who Glenn had on his program) called The Roots of Obama's Rage, which asserted that Obama had the mentality of an anti-colonialist which was instilled in him by his father. This is one reason why the relationship between the US and Britain under Obama's regime has been strained from the beginning. Before he became president it was pretty clear Obama had the same attitude toward the US.
The second thing leftists like to point to is Beck's belief that there is a union of convenience between communists and Islamists in Egypt. They can ridicule him all they like but, just as there are links between labor unions and people in the Obama administration with international socialist and Marxist movements, collectivists and Islamists joined forces to march against the government of Egypt.
From Al Jazeera:
Quote:
In the third consecutive Friday of protests, about 3,500 opposition activists from JordanÆs main Islamist opposition group, trade unions and leftist organisations gathered in the capital, waving colourful banners reading: ôSend the corrupt guys to courtö.
From the Herald-Sun:
Quote:
Tens of thousands of demonstrators have started a silent protest in the Albanian capital Tirana, a week to the day after clashes during an opposition rally killed three.
The demonstrators, headed by the leadership of the opposition Socialists and the families of the victims, started a march on the government buildings.
Now, if the either group got into power would they remain allied? No. Communism has a much bloodier history than Islam.
But the alliance of convenience that Beck spoke of? Absolutely real.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 00:40:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Jada Maroo on 04/05/2011 00:44:13
Originally by: Astenion
They didn't fire him from Fox, they sh!tcanned his show because no sponsors wanted to be associated with such a moron and any of his moronic followers. He had 2 million viewers and lost 300 (THREE HUNDRED!) ad sponsors. He's a delusional idiot and anyone who takes his word as gospel is an idiot as well.
His show is fully sponsored, actually. It doesn't matter if 300 companies refuse to sponsor you as long as you have a loyal group that never drops. In fact my biggest complaint about Beck's show on Fox is that after the first 15 minutes, he has too many commercials.
Quote:
WHAT KIND OF WORDS *DID* HE MEAN, THEN?
Caps always make for a convincing argument!
If you were to actually read my entire post before posting a knee-jerk response consisting of 90% caps and smilies, you'd see that I answered that question.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 00:47:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Astenion
Fully sponsored, huh? Is that why his show got canned?
Are you saying that those ads for gold and what-not between the breaks on his show are not commercials?
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 00:59:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Astenion
Beck was backtracking because he's an idiot and embarrassed himself and everyone else at Fox, which is pretty hard to do.
Beck said, "This president has a deep-seated hatred for white people, or the white culture, I dunno..."
So you're telling me that he can justify that somehow by saying what he REALLY meant was he was anti-colonialist?
Even funnier!!!!!
Not only is that what I am saying, that is what Dinesh D'Souza identified as the ideat Beck was trying to understand. Americans don't really have a concept of it anymore -- the closest thing we have is the Revolutionary War.
Anti colonialism today is a rejection of Westernism, more or less. Or some would say a rejection of imposed Westernism, or opposition at least to those who imposed it. From the point of view of Obama's father (and Dinesh D'Souza's father), they were mostly white westerners.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 01:02:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Astenion
You DO realize that he has to finish his contract, right, and that his show is ending later this year, right? They didn't just pull the plug...they refused to resign his contract. Therefore, he finishes his contract now. A little deductive reasoning isn't too much to ask.
Oh, and btw, his show in the UK has *NO* ads because no one wants to be associated with him. That's right, Glenn Beck runs commercial-free in the UK, which just means one continuous LAWL for everyone there.
Beck is continuing to produce for Fox, as said in my first response. And I'm surprised his show runs at all in the UK actually. It's a very American-centric show, and I don't think most Britis would even care to watch it.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 01:17:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Astenion
Holy crap, how many times do I have to say it? His show getting canceled is due to him being a delusional idiot. He's not leaving for better things, he's being transferred to the mailroom because he's out of his mind.
I wonder how many other mailroom employees will be producing specials for Fox News then. They sure picked a funny way to keep him hidden.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 01:23:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Astenion
You just said that hating white people = rejecting western society, that it doesn't mean you're racist, it means you don't like fast food and Apple.
Wow. I have to say with all honesty that you're the reason I got out of the military.
Yes, that is exactly what I said. Verbatim!
Maybe the reason you left the military is that you don't pay attention to what is said, and substitute it for what you want to hear. I hope your new job isn't a court reporter!
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 02:04:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Astenion
The end.
Oh, you're leaving the thread then? I'll miss you arguing with your own straw men. 
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 02:21:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Jada Maroo on 04/05/2011 02:21:26
Originally by: Herr Wilkus
There are days where he makes excellent points - and at times the show is spontaneously laugh-out-loud funny as well, rivaling actual scripted 'comedy' shows like Jon Stewart. Agree with him or not, he's been quite savvy in building his multimillion dollar media empire - and I have a hard time equating that with 'idiotic delusion'.
One of the strange things about the Beck-Stewart relationship is that they actually seem to like each other. At the very least there is a odd sort of mutual respect -- probably because Beck comes from a comedy background he understands Stewart's impersonation of him isn't meant to be taken personally.
Jon Stewart actually called Glenn Beck a few nights before the "Rally to Restore Sanity." Stewart said something along the lines of "Oh my god this is actually happening. What do I do?" I'd love to know what other conversations they've had privately.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 20:04:00 -
[20]
Muslim Brotherhood condemns Bin Laden's "assassination"
Oh, look at that! The "moderate" Muslim group that only wanted freedom from that mean old Egyptian dictator is finally showing its true colors.
The headline should have read:
Western intelligentsia scammed again, conservative skeptics vindicated.
|
|
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 20:13:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Jada Maroo on 04/05/2011 20:17:48
Oh my god! You all have to see this. It's graphic, I warn you, but look at the top left, just above his shoulder! He was armed!
Bin Laden buddy fought back, several SEAL team members heavily soaked
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 22:06:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Jno Aubrey
And anyway, he already won the Peace Prize just for being himself, so he no longer needs to worry about World Opinion.
He should melt it down and turn it into bullets.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.06 18:51:00 -
[23]
UK Islamists Rally in London
Note to Europe - ya'll might want to stop letting these people into your countries.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.07 00:18:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Astenion
It's no different than that idiot "God hates F@gs" preacher. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of speech unless you don't like what they say...it means FREEDOM of speech. As much as you Teabaggers rant and rave about freedom, it's surprising to see that you don't even know what it means.
Tea Party activists don't typically fly planes into buildings or plant bombs on trains. That's pretty much an Islamist thing. Although, radical leftists still far, far outpace Islamists in incidents of domestic terrorism. They've been at the top of the charts now for well over a decade. They just lack Islam's body count.
And you don't have the right to provide aid and comfort to the enemy. Marching in the street doesn't rise to that definition, but I'd be willing to bet several of those marching sent money to groups they aren't supposed to, legally. Abd I don't know about laws in the UK, but I don't think you're actually allowed to legally wear masks during a protest since it is cause for suspicion that you intend to break the law.
So all those women in beekeeper outfits really ought to be forced to unmask themselves, assuming the laws are the same over there.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.07 00:30:00 -
[25]
Originally by: ceaon
if there is legal ground for this i hope this will go frontward
Wait wait wait... You actually think it should be illegal to say "I'm glad Osama bin Laden is dead."? Really?
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.07 00:40:00 -
[26]
Edited by: Jada Maroo on 07/05/2011 00:45:15
Originally by: Astenion
No, they just stomp on women's heads and give them concussions at Rand Paul political rallies.
Sorry, concussion's the best that they can do. They don't have the finger-biting-off experience of leftists and union thugs or bomb making expertise that Obama's mentor had. Maybe some day!
Quote:
So you're saying that simply because they dislike the West that they're automatically terrorists and that they can't be afforded the freedom of speech and assembly, is that it? Again, it doesn't matter whether you like it or not, it's freedom of speech. As long as their speech isn't inciting riots, there's no crime.
Well there are limits to freedom of speech, and I'm not sure this would fall under its protection actually. Imagine this were in print form and you were handing out pamplets supporting bin Laden and al Qaeda. They are actively at war with the United Staes government. I'm not sure you wouldn't get arrested. At the very least, you'd be having a long talk with Homeland Security. And if you're here on any sort of visa, you wouldn't have it for long.
This is a grey area. The government is probably within its authority through treason acts to prevent that sort of literature's publication. I just don't know whether they'd do it.
|
Jada Maroo
|
Posted - 2011.05.07 01:47:00 -
[27]
Edited by: Jada Maroo on 07/05/2011 01:47:53
Originally by: Astenion
I've always said you people are idiots, but I didn't realize how little you knew about the things you protest so much.
Reported.
You just can't type out a response without resorting to your tired old crutch of flaming, can you? You're gonna break that thing one of these days!
|
|
|
| |
|